Vol. 01 · Case Index · Updated Q2 2026 publishing live · all systems nominal

Production AI · 70+ Engagements · Global Delivery

AI case studies that show you exactly how production AI gets built.

Real architectures. Named architects. Reference calls on request.

Browse 70+ enterprise AI engagements across manufacturing, healthcare, BFSI, logistics, and construction — with the full decision log behind every outcome.

No sales reps. Talk to the architect.
Stacked enterprise AI case study cards with a pulled-forward before/after metric panel showing civil plan approval cycle time reducing from 3 weeks to 4 days.
Fig. 01 — Case Stack · Civil 3wk → 4d
§A · Engagements 70+ Engagements delivered
§B · Coverage 5 Industries covered with named cases
§C · Accuracy 99.2% Best documented detection accuracy
§D · Speed 70% Fastest cycle-time reduction documented

Credentials · Architect · ISO 27001 verified · Q2 2026

Cert · 01 NVIDIA Certified AI Architect badge NVIDIA Certified AI Architect
Cert · 02 ISO 27001 Information Security badge ISO 27001 Information Security
Cert · 03 NVIDIA Inception Partner badge NVIDIA Inception Partner
Cert · 04 Upwork Top Rated Plus (Top 3%) badge Upwork Top Rated Plus (Top 3%)
Cert · 05 AWS Activate Startup Ecosystem badge AWS Activate Startup Ecosystem
Cert · 06 Microsoft for Startups badge Microsoft for Startups
Client roster · selected 12 of 70+ engagements
Incepteo Darkhorse Sapio Prescient Lightning V-Click 3D Andes Bugmapper Gauss Moto Pingaaksh Nxon Gemperts India
Plus 58 more behind NDA Trusted by enterprise teams across 5 industries
Architected by  Mitesh Patel  · NVIDIA Certified AI Architect · Upwork Top Rated Plus (Top 3%)
17 · cases & snapshots in archive filter is live
Industry
Capability
Outcome type
5 of 17 cases shown

5 detailed case studies. 100% production-shipped work.

These are the five engagements where the client signed off on full public attribution, the architecture pattern is reusable, and the metrics are independently verifiable. Each card shows the before-state, the after-state, and links to the full case study with architecture diagrams and decision logs.

99.2% Defect Detection Accuracy at the Factory Edge

YOLO-based real-time visual inspection on NVIDIA Jetson processes 200+ units per hour at the line. Sub-50ms reject decisions. Customer-facing defect escapes dropped 85% in the first quarter post-deployment.

Before Manual QC
After 99.2%
detection accuracy at line

Real-Time Multi-Camera Player Tracking for Coaching Staff

Multi-camera computer vision pipeline detects, tracks, and re-identifies players across multiple synchronized feeds. Outputs frame-level movement data, speed metrics, and tactical heatmaps for coaches and broadcast overlays.

Before Post-match
After Real-time
player tracking latency

No cases match this combination yet — try removing a filter, or send us a brief and we’ll tell you if we’ve done it before.

Send a brief →

Your industry might not be in the 5

Don’t see your industry? That’s because we publish what we ship, not what we promise.

We’ve delivered engagements in retail, education, energy, agriculture, and 6 other sectors that aren’t visible above — most under NDA. Tell us what you’re scoping. We’ll tell you within 24 hours whether we’ve solved something similar.

Book 30-min architecture call
  • No sales reps · talk to the architect
  • No prep needed · bring questions or a brief
  • Full NDA on request · we’ll send one before the call

Three engagements with the steepest documented before/after.

These are the three engagements that produced the strongest measurable shift between manual baseline and production deployment.

Construction Speed

70%

faster civil plan approvals

3 weeks → 4 days

View full case
Manufacturing Accuracy

99.2%

defect detection at factory edge

Manual QC → 99.2% automated

View full case
Healthcare Throughput

12×

medical coding turnaround

48 hours → 4 hours

View full case

Browse case studies by industry.

Click a tile to filter the grid above, or click the deep link inside each tile to jump to the corresponding industry page.

Browse case studies by AI capability.

Click a tile to filter the grid above, or click the service-page link to read the full capability page.

12 anonymized engagement snapshots — work behind NDA.

These are anonymized snapshots of engagements where the client has not yet cleared us to publish a full case study, or where the architecture pattern is reusable but the business context is proprietary. The headline metric, capability, tech stack, and industry are accurate — only client identity and proprietary detail are withheld.

NDA SN-01 of 12 BFSI · Insurance underwriting

Document AI + RAG

84% straight-through processing rate on new policy applications

LlamaIndex Azure OpenAI custom NER PostgreSQL
NDA SN-02 of 12 BFSI · Investment banking

AI Agent

10× faster pitch-book generation with auto-verified data sourcing

GPT-4o LangGraph vector store structured tool calls
NDA SN-03 of 12 Manufacturing · Pharma packaging

Computer Vision · Edge AI

Zero false-negative defect escapes across 18-month production run

YOLOv8 NVIDIA Jetson Orin TensorRT MQTT
NDA SN-04 of 12 Manufacturing · Auto parts

Computer Vision · Robotics

30% reduction in vision-guided pick cycle time on robotic arm cell

OpenCV ROS 2 Intel RealSense ABB IRB 1200
NDA SN-05 of 12 Healthcare · Imaging diagnostics

Computer Vision

Radiology triage assistant with 96% sensitivity on flagged scans

MONAI PyTorch DICOM ingestion HL7 FHIR
NDA SN-06 of 12 Healthcare · Clinical operations

RAG · AI Agent

Internal clinical guidelines assistant used by 240+ care providers

GPT-4 Pinecone retrieval rerankers HIPAA-compliant hosting
NDA SN-07 of 12 Logistics · Warehouse operations

Computer Vision · Edge AI

98% inventory location accuracy via overhead-camera tracking

YOLOv8 multi-camera fusion NVIDIA DeepStream custom Kafka
NDA SN-08 of 12 Logistics · Last-mile delivery

Generative AI · NLP

Auto-generated multilingual delivery exception responses (12 languages)

Claude multilingual prompt orchestration webhook routing
NDA SN-09 of 12 Retail · Specialty grocery

Computer Vision · Video Analytics

Real-time aisle compliance and out-of-stock detection across 80 stores

YOLOv8 cloud edge hybrid MQTT React dashboard
NDA SN-10 of 12 Energy · Utility grid

Computer Vision · Edge AI

Drone-captured infrastructure inspection automated for 4,000+ km of grid

NVIDIA Jetson Xavier custom segmentation models QGIS integration
NDA SN-11 of 12 Agriculture · Greenhouse operations

Computer Vision · IoT

12% yield improvement via pest detection and growth-stage classification

Vision Transformer Raspberry Pi 5 environmental sensor fusion
NDA SN-12 of 12 Construction · Site safety

Computer Vision · Video Analytics

PPE compliance monitoring with 94% precision across 8 active sites

YOLOv8 NVIDIA DeepStream alerting via Slack and SMS

Scoping something not on this list? We’ve probably done it.

Send a 2-3 sentence brief describing what you’re scoping. Within 24 hours we’ll tell you whether we’ve shipped a comparable engagement, what the architecture looked like, and what we’d quote as a starting point. No formal RFP needed.

Actually works in production

Most of our engagements never appear in a public case study.

Yours probably won’t either. That’s fine — we’d rather ship to production than build for our portfolio.

70+ Enterprise engagements delivered
9 years In production AI since 2018
5 industries Manufacturing, Healthcare, BFSI, Logistics, Construction
12+ capabilities From Edge AI to RAG to Robotics
Book 30-min architecture call

No commitment · No sales reps · Talk to the architect directly

Editor’s note

Why we don’t publish every engagement we ship.

Most case study pages are sales documents pretending to be portfolios. Vendors publish the engagements that produced the cleanest before/after metrics, the most quotable client lines, and the least proprietary architecture. The buyer assumes this is representative work. It almost never is.

I want to be straight with you about how this page gets curated. We have shipped 70+ enterprise AI engagements since 2018. You see 5 detailed case studies and 12 anonymized snapshots on this page. Here is the actual rule I apply when deciding what to publish.

A detailed case study goes up only when three conditions are all met. The client has signed off on attribution and the specific metrics shown. The architectural pattern is genuinely reusable, so reading it gives the next buyer something they can apply. The outcome is independently verifiable — meaning if you ask for a reference call with that client, we will set it up.

Anonymized snapshots cover the much larger middle of our work. Many of our largest engagements live here permanently — particularly in BFSI, healthcare, and pharma, where NDAs run for years and the architecture details are proprietary by design. The snapshot tells you the industry, the capability, the headline metric, and the tech stack. That is the most honest version of the engagement we can publish without breaking trust with the client.

If you are evaluating us against larger generalist firms, the question worth asking is not ‘how many case studies do they have’ — every 1,000-person firm has many. The question is ‘do the people who built them still work there, and can I talk to them directly.’ On this page, every case study and every snapshot reflects work the current team architected and shipped. The architect on the call is the architect on the project.

Mitesh Patel, Founder & Director · NVIDIA Certified AI Architect · Upwork Top Rated Plus (Top 3%)
Connect on LinkedIn
The Brainy Neurals team, photographed outside the office in Ahmedabad.
Fig. 03 — The team · Ahmedabad office · Q1 2026

The team behind the work

The architect on the call is the architect on the project.

Every case study and snapshot on this page reflects work this team architected and shipped. No outsourced subcontractors. No staff augmentation pass-throughs. When you book the call, the people in this photo are the people who’ll be in the room.

12+ Engineers and architects on staff
9 yrs Median tenure on production AI
3 Global hubs · San Jose · London · Ahmedabad

Free reference architectures from our most-deployed patterns.

These are the three architecture patterns we deploy most frequently across our case studies. Each PDF is a single document covering the component diagram, the technology choices we made, the trade-offs we considered, and the failure modes we engineered for.

Reference architecture cover graphic showing camera, edge inference box, and dashboard. PDF · 18pp · 2.4 MB

Computer Vision Factory Inspection Pattern

cv-factory-inspection-reference-architecture.pdf

End-to-end reference for deploying YOLO-based visual inspection at the factory edge. Covers camera selection, edge hardware sizing for NVIDIA Jetson, TensorRT optimization path, MQTT-based control integration, dataset labeling protocols, drift monitoring, and the rollback strategy when a model degrades in production.

What’s inside

  • Component diagram: camera → edge box → MES/SCADA → operator dashboard
  • Hardware sizing table: Jetson Nano vs Xavier NX vs Orin Nano vs Orin AGX — when to choose each
  • Latency budget breakdown: 50ms target, where each component must land
  • Drift detection thresholds and rollback triggers
  • Common failure modes and their architectural responses
Reference architecture cover graphic showing documents flowing into a vector store and out as a chat response. PDF · 16pp · 2.1 MB

RAG System Reference Pattern

rag-system-reference-architecture.pdf

Production RAG reference covering ingestion, chunking, embedding, vector storage, retrieval, reranking, generation, and observability. The pattern this PDF documents is what we deploy for internal knowledge bases, technical support assistants, and clinical guidelines retrieval in our healthcare engagements.

What’s inside

  • Component diagram: source documents → chunker → embedder → vector store → retriever → reranker → LLM → response
  • Chunking strategies: fixed vs semantic vs hierarchical — when each works and when it fails
  • Vector store selection guidance: Pinecone vs Weaviate vs Qdrant vs PostgreSQL pgvector
  • Reranker integration patterns and their cost-quality trade-offs
  • Hallucination guardrails: structured-output prompting, citation requirements, refusal handling
Reference architecture cover graphic showing a stack of documents flowing into a structured database. PDF · 20pp · 2.7 MB

Document AI Pipeline Reference Pattern

docai-pipeline-reference-architecture.pdf

End-to-end document AI pipeline reference covering ingestion across 40+ formats, classification, structured extraction, named entity recognition, validation, exception handling, and audit logging. This is the pattern behind our medical coding and BFSI compliance case studies.

What’s inside

  • Component diagram: source intake → format normalization → classifier → extractor → validator → output adapter → audit log
  • Format support matrix: PDFs (born-digital and scanned), TIFFs, DOCX, XLSX, image-based, scanned forms
  • Extraction strategies: schema-driven (Azure Form Recognizer, AWS Textract) vs LLM-driven (GPT-4o, Claude) — when each is correct
  • Compliance integration: HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR audit-log requirements
  • Exception routing: confidence thresholds and human-in-the-loop handoff patterns

Browse case studies by outcome type.

Click a tile to filter case studies by the kind of measurable outcome they delivered.

Speed (cycle-time reduction)

Featured: Civil plan approvals, medical coding, pitch-book generation

70% faster 12× faster 10× faster
Filter cases

Accuracy (error rate / detection)

Featured: Tire defect detection, radiology triage, PPE compliance

99.2% 96% sensitivity 94% precision
Filter cases

Cost (operational efficiency)

Featured: Document review automation, KYC processing, warehouse vision

80% time saved 84% STP 98% accuracy
Filter cases

Compliance (regulatory / audit-ready)

Featured: BFSI document AI, HIPAA medical coding, infrastructure inspection

Audit-ready logs HIPAA-compliant SOC 2-aligned
Filter cases

How an engagement becomes a case study.

Every case above followed the same four-phase path. Here’s what each phase actually contains.

  1. PH-01

    Discovery & scoping

    1-2 weeks
    What happens

    30-min architecture call → written scoping summary → optional NDA → detailed proposal with fixed-cost POC scope.

    What the client sees

    A proposal that names a real architect, defines success metrics, and quotes a fixed POC price.

  2. PH-02

    POC sprint

    3-6 weeks
    What happens

    Architecture design → data ingestion → model training and validation → POC demo on representative data → quantified results and decision document.

    What the client sees

    A working demo and a written decision document on whether to proceed to production.

  3. PH-03

    Production build

    6-16 weeks
    What happens

    Production architecture → integration with client systems → deployment to client infrastructure → user acceptance testing → hand-off documentation.

    What the client sees

    A production deployment, a runbook, and a transition plan.

  4. PH-04

    Operations & case-study clearance

    Ongoing
    What happens

    Monitoring → drift detection → quarterly model refresh → client-side metrics tracking → publication clearance discussion at 6-12 months.

    What the client sees

    Stable production system. Case study published only if all three publication conditions are met (see Editor’s Note).

Engagements that don’t follow this path: staff augmentation engagements (where we embed engineers into the client’s team and the client owns the architecture) follow a different model. Those engagements aren’t represented in the case studies above because the architecture isn’t ours to publish.

How our case studies compare to typical vendor portfolios.

Most enterprise AI vendors publish case studies that look the same: a client logo, a problem sentence, an outcome metric, and a quote. The table below uses the evaluation criteria that actually matter when a CTO is deciding whom to trust with a real production engagement.

Brainy Neurals case studies vs. typical generalist vendor portfolios — five evaluation criteria
Evaluation criterion Brainy NeuralsCase studies Typical generalist vendorPortfolio
Architectural depth disclosed Component diagram, technology choices, and trade-off log included in every detail page. Reference architecture PDFs available for the most-used patterns. Outcome metric only. Architecture occasionally summarized at a marketing level. Detailed component diagrams rarely available.
Named architect attribution Every detail page names the architect who led the engagement, with credentials and a LinkedIn link. Buyer can verify the architect still works here. Generic ‘our team delivered’ attribution. Named individuals (if any) are senior salespeople, not the engineers who built the work.
Trade-offs and failure modes documented Each detail page includes a ‘what we considered and rejected’ section, plus the failure modes the architecture engineers for. Trade-offs treated as proprietary or simply not discussed. Failure modes rarely acknowledged.
Reference call availability Reference calls available on request for every detailed case study, mediated by us. Clients have agreed to take the call at engagement signing. References promised but rarely delivered. Calls often facilitated only at proposal stage and only with the client’s marketing contact.
Publication standard transparency Three explicit conditions for publication (client sign-off, reusable pattern, verifiable metrics) — disclosed in the editor’s note on this page. Publication criteria not disclosed. Case studies appear to be cherry-picked from the most flattering engagements.

Frequently asked questions.

If your buying committee is asking it, we’ve answered it here. If it’s not here, ask on the call.

FAQ-01Do you have case studies in my industry?
Our five detailed case studies cover manufacturing, healthcare, BFSI, construction, and sports. Our 12 anonymized engagement snapshots extend coverage to insurance, investment banking, pharma, automotive, imaging diagnostics, clinical operations, warehouse and last-mile logistics, retail, energy, agriculture, and construction site safety. If your industry isn’t represented, send a 2-3 sentence brief — within 24 hours we’ll tell you whether we’ve shipped something comparable behind NDA.
FAQ-02Can I get reference calls with your clients?
Yes, for every detailed case study above. Clients featured in published cases have agreed at engagement signing to take a reference call from a serious buyer. Reference calls are mediated by us — we set up the call, brief both sides, and the client controls scope of disclosure. We don’t share contact information directly. Anonymized snapshots typically cannot offer reference calls because the underlying NDA covers the client identity.
FAQ-03Why are some engagements anonymized?
Most enterprise AI engagements run under NDAs that prohibit naming the client publicly. In BFSI and healthcare, NDAs often extend for years and cover the architecture details, not just the client identity. We anonymize when required, but the headline metric, industry, capability, and tech stack shown for anonymized snapshots are accurate and verifiable in private discussion. Trust signals on this page (named architects, reference calls for non-anonymized cases, publication standard transparency) compensate for the anonymity constraint.
FAQ-04What separates a ‘case study’ from an ‘engagement’ on this page?
An engagement is any production-shipped piece of work we delivered for a client. A case study is an engagement that has cleared three publication conditions: written client sign-off on attribution and metrics, a reusable architectural pattern that gives the next buyer something they can apply, and metrics that are independently verifiable via reference call. We have 70+ engagements. Five clear all three conditions today; twelve clear two of three (verifiable + reusable, but no public client attribution); the rest remain private.
FAQ-05Can I see actual architecture diagrams and code?
Yes, partially. Every detail case study includes the production architecture diagram and the key technology choices. The reference architecture PDFs above contain even deeper diagrams, technology comparison tables, and trade-off discussions for the three most-used patterns (Computer Vision factory inspection, RAG, Document AI). Client-specific code is proprietary and not publishable, but the architectural patterns and the decision logic behind them are fully documented.
FAQ-06How recent are these case studies?
All five detailed case studies and all 12 anonymized snapshots are from production engagements within the last 36 months — the relevant window for AI architecture decisions, since the underlying technology stack changes quickly. We refresh the case studies grid every quarter to add new engagements, retire cases where the technology has been superseded, and update metrics where production data has shifted. The featured case at the top of the page rotates quarterly to keep the hub feeling current.
FAQ-07Did you only publish your best work?
In effect, yes — and we say so explicitly in the editor’s note above. Every case study page on the public internet (ours, and every vendor’s) is a selection. The honest version of this question is: ‘What are the criteria for that selection?’ Our criteria are spelled out in the editor’s note: client sign-off, reusable pattern, verifiable metrics. We are not publishing every failed POC or every engagement that didn’t make it to production. We can talk about those on a discovery call when relevant — they tell you more about how we think than the wins do.
FAQ-08How does my engagement become a case study like the ones above?
Follow the four-phase methodology above. Phase 1 (discovery, 1-2 weeks) ends with a written scoping summary and a proposal. Phase 2 (POC sprint, 3-6 weeks) ends with a working demo and a go/no-go decision. Phase 3 (production build, 6-16 weeks) ends with a deployed system. Phase 4 (operations, ongoing) is where we discuss case study publication — typically 6 to 12 months after production go-live, once the metrics have stabilized. Most engagements stay private; the path to a public case study is opt-in by the client.
9 years in production AI 70+ enterprise engagements 5 industries · 12+ capabilities NVIDIA Certified · ISO 27001 Upwork Top Rated Plus (Top 3%)

Talk to the architect

Ready to talk about your specific architecture?

Skip the discovery questionnaire. Book a 30-minute call with Mitesh Patel directly. Bring a brief, a question, or just a problem you’re scoping. You’ll leave with a clear sense of whether we’re the right fit.

Book 30-min architecture call

No sales reps · No prep needed · Full NDA on request